Author summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos2,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katrina Schollenberger results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 4,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,179 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (4,008 of 8,955 authors). This Katrina Schollenberger is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Katrina Schollenberger
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠56%Katrina Schollenberger (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,179
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.0%8.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos