Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video56.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wild Hornets results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (25,191 of 45,124 speakers). This Wild Hornets is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Wild Hornets
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠45%Wild Hornets (selected)26%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
25.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos56.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.8%25.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos