Speaker summary
32%5 analyzed articles/videos95.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Watch Duty results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 95.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (36,867 of 45,145 speakers). This Watch Duty is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Watch Duty
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
19%Watch Duty (selected)13%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
12.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos95.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate