Author summary
51% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Perkins results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,958 hits . Analysis detected 9,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,269 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (4,979 of 8,706 authors). This Nick Perkins is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Nick Perkins
Author details
Total words: 14,269
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 13.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst