Speaker summary
58% 96 analyzed articles/videos 7,510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volodymyr Zelenskyy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 878.56 hits . Analysis detected 8,473.527 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,510 analyzed words across 96 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (42,332 of 42,524 speakers). This Volodymyr Zelenskyy is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Volodymyr Zelenskyy
Speaker details
Total words: 7,510
Article count: 96
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score96 analyzed videos7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 29% 7/31/2026, 6:30:54 AM