Speaker summary
64% 28 analyzed articles/videos 1,182.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treasury Department results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Status Quo Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 314.042 hits . Analysis detected 1,880.944 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,182.333 analyzed words across 28 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (43,646 of 45,369 speakers). This Treasury Department is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Treasury Department
Speaker details
Total words: 1,182.333
Content count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.8% percentile 5.5% BS Score28 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.6% 18.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 23.8% 23.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst