Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MORIAH BALINGIT The Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 1,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,309 of 9,201 authors). This MORIAH BALINGIT The Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group. MORIAH BALINGIT The Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 3,812
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst