Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video145.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Wu results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Halo Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 21.247 hits. Analysis detected 21.247 faulty-reasoning hits from 145.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (35,334 of 45,145 speakers). This Tony Wu is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Tony Wu
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠22%Tony Wu (selected)14%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 145.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
13.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos145.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos