Speaker summary
⁠85%3 analyzed articles/videos111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These the department results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 48.6% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 201 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (20,839 of 41,559 speakers). This the department is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
the department
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠50%the department (selected)31%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 111
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
30.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 27.9%27.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.9%27.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos