Speaker summary
⁠48%4 analyzed articles/videos451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth Meyers results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 600.29 faulty-reasoning hits from 451 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (44,937 of 45,666 speakers). This Seth Meyers is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Seth Meyers
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠2%Seth Meyers (selected)4%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 451
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos451 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos