Speaker summary
61% 4 analyzed articles/videos 189.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nella McOsker results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , False Dilemma , and Pessimism Bias , with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 73.108 hits . Analysis detected 575.108 faulty-reasoning hits from 189.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of 25% (33,890 of 45,112 speakers). This Nella McOsker is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Nella McOsker
Speaker details
Total words: 189.333
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.9% percentile 15.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos189.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 39.8% 39.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 39.8% 39.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 34.2% 34.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% False Dilemma: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Middle Ground: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst