Speaker summary
⁠58%4 analyzed articles/videos554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neama Rahmani results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Representativeness Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 912.359 faulty-reasoning hits from 554 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (43,225 of 45,120 speakers). This Neama Rahmani is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Neama Rahmani
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠5%Neama Rahmani (selected)6%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 554
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.2% percentile
5.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos554 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.4%23.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.5%15.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos