Speaker summary
⁠52%5 analyzed articles/videos298.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Nakase results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and False Dilemma, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 81 hits. Analysis detected 320.378 faulty-reasoning hits from 298.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (41,042 of 45,123 speakers). This Natalie Nakase is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Natalie Nakase
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠9%Natalie Nakase (selected)9%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 298.667
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
8.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos298.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.3%16.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos