Speaker summary
⁠33%3 analyzed articles/videos157.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammed results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 157.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (34,431 of 41,729 speakers). This Mohammed is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Mohammed
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠18%Mohammed (selected)13%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 157.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
12.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos157.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos