33%2 analyzed articles/videos181.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Nature, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 168.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 181.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (37,552 of 40,165 speakers).This Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.