Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Board of Pardons results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (3,750 of 40,369 speakers). This Minnesota Board of Pardons is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Minnesota Board of Pardons
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠91%Minnesota Board of Pardons (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 20
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos20 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos