Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Molina results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 94.7% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 194 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (14,951 of 42,250 speakers). This Michelle Molina is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Michelle Molina
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠65%Michelle Molina (selected)47%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
46.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 94.7%94.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 94.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos