Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Episkopos results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Sunk Cost Effect, False Dilemma, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 99.643 hits. Analysis detected 771.07 faulty-reasoning hits from 233 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (33,923 of 44,381 speakers). This Mark Episkopos is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Mark Episkopos
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠24%Mark Episkopos (selected)15%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 233
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
14.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos233 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 30.7%30.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos