Speaker summary
59% 58 analyzed articles/videos 2,756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Carney results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 326 hits . Analysis detected 3,428.557 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,756 analyzed words across 58 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,853 of 45,119 speakers). This Mark Carney is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Mark Carney
Speaker details
Total words: 2,756
Content count: 58
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score58 analyzed videos2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst