Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video84.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Hylands results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 145 faulty-reasoning hits from 84.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (22,874 of 40,821 speakers). This Luke Hylands is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Luke Hylands
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠44%Luke Hylands (selected)26%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 84.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
25.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos84.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.4%11.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos