Speaker summary
32% 23 analyzed articles/videos 1,440.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Clancy results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 835.388 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,440.667 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (45,090 of 45,549 speakers). This Lindsay Clancy is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Lindsay Clancy
Speaker details
Total words: 1,440.667
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score23 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Composition/Division: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst