Author summary
44%3 analyzed articles/videos2,420 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travis Andersen results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 989 hits. Analysis detected 5,431 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,680 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,647 of 9,092 authors). This Travis Andersen is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Travis Andersen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
38%Travis Andersen (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,680
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate