Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jung Eui-jung results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Bandwagon, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (17,530 of 40,537 speakers). This Jung Eui-jung is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Jung Eui-jung
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠57%Jung Eui-jung (selected)37%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.8% percentile
36.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos