Speaker summary
⁠75%3 analyzed articles/videos185.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joyce Vance results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Begging the Question, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 562.998 faulty-reasoning hits from 185.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (29,618 of 40,478 speakers). This Joyce Vance is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Joyce Vance
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠27%Joyce Vance (selected)17%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 185.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
16.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos185.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 24.2%24.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.5%23.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 19.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos