Speaker summary
57% 7 analyzed articles/videos 526.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jared Genser results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 144.251 hits . Analysis detected 1,059.091 faulty-reasoning hits from 526.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (40,608 of 45,120 speakers). This Jared Genser is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Jared Genser
Speaker details
Total words: 526.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 8.7% BS Score7 analyzed videos526.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 23.6% 23.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst