Speaker summary
⁠55%4 analyzed articles/videos186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Itamar Ben Gvir results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 584.638 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words across 4 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (32,039 of 41,799 speakers). This Itamar Ben Gvir is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
Itamar Ben Gvir
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠24%Itamar Ben Gvir (selected)15%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
14.7% BS Score4 analyzed videos186 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 42.2%42.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 42.2%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos