Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ilia Topuria results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 45% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (14,967 of 41,291 speakers). This Ilia Topuria is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Ilia Topuria
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠64%Ilia Topuria (selected)45%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.8% percentile
45.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos