Author summary
47%2 analyzed articles/videos545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soorin Kim results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 908 hits. Analysis detected 2,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,504 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (4,041 of 8,881 authors). This Soorin Kim is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Soorin Kim
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
55%Soorin Kim (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,504
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.3%10.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos