Speaker summary
⁠85%4 analyzed articles/videos246 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hong results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 273 faulty-reasoning hits from 246 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (27,989 of 45,134 speakers). This Hong is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
Hong
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠38%Hong (selected)23%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 246
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510038.0% percentile
22.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos246 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 48.8%48.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.3%9.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 48.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos