Speaker summary
65% 7 analyzed articles/videos 509.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Pingree results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 107.267 hits . Analysis detected 1,001.386 faulty-reasoning hits from 509.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (41,872 of 45,124 speakers). This Hannah Pingree is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group. Hannah Pingree
Speaker details
Total words: 509.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.2% percentile 7.4% BS Score7 analyzed videos509.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst