Speaker summary
43% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,765.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hank Green results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 423 hits . Analysis detected 2,159.289 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,765.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,865 of 45,122 speakers). This Hank Green is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Hank Green
Speaker details
Total words: 1,765.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed videos1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst