Speaker summary
59% 42 analyzed articles/videos 2,564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haley Stevens results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 293.305 hits . Analysis detected 3,135.291 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 42 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (40,485 of 40,844 speakers). This Haley Stevens is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Haley Stevens
Speaker details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 42
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score42 analyzed videos2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst