Speaker summary
41% 3 analyzed articles/videos 312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GiveSendGo results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Circular Reasoning , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 123 hits . Analysis detected 447.589 faulty-reasoning hits from 312 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 17% (35,985 of 43,145 speakers). This GiveSendGo is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. GiveSendGo
Speaker details
Total words: 312
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.6% percentile 11.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos312 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 28.5% 28.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 19.0% 19.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 7.5% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst