Speaker summary
57% 49 analyzed articles/videos 2,912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gianni Infantino results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 4,259.319 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 49 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (43,835 of 44,469 speakers). This Gianni Infantino is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Gianni Infantino
Speaker details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 49
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score49 analyzed videos2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst