Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fred Hawkins results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (26,851 of 45,123 speakers). This Fred Hawkins is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Fred Hawkins
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠41%Fred Hawkins (selected)24%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
23.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos