Speaker summary
57% 14 analyzed articles/videos 759.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CISA results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Status Quo Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 141.328 hits . Analysis detected 740.864 faulty-reasoning hits from 759.667 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 7% (42,217 of 45,134 speakers). This CISA is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. CISA
Speaker details
Total words: 759.667
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 7.0% BS Score14 analyzed videos759.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.6% Composition/Division: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst