Speaker summary
57% 6 analyzed articles/videos 786.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cavalier Johnson results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 168.16 hits . Analysis detected 1,466.233 faulty-reasoning hits from 786.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,687 of 45,112 speakers). This Cavalier Johnson is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. Cavalier Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 786.333
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos786.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst