Author summary
3% 1 analyzed article/video 992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Aguilar results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 148 hits . Analysis detected 808 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (8,141 of 8,955 authors). This Jonathan Aguilar is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Jonathan Aguilar
Author details
Total words: 3,968
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst