Speaker summary
87%12 analyzed articles/videos243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bulwark+ Takes results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Representativeness Heuristic, and In-Group Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 90.1% saturation with 219.006 hits. Analysis detected 316.006 faulty-reasoning hits from 243 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (28,072 of 42,554 speakers). This Bulwark+ Takes is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Bulwark+ Takes
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
34%Bulwark+ Takes (selected)21%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
20.1% BS Score12 analyzed videos243 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 90.1%90.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 90.1%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate