Speaker summary
81%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryan Ávila results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 59.2% saturation with 52.686 hits. Analysis detected 332.695 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of 62% (17,437 of 45,145 speakers). This Bryan Ávila is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Bryan Ávila
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
62%Bryan Ávila (selected)41%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
40.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 52.9%52.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.8%42.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 47.1%47.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.7%32.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 47.1%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 42.8%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos