Speaker summary
58% 5 analyzed articles/videos 308.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Batya Ungar-Sargon results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Straw Man , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 99.174 hits . Analysis detected 773.444 faulty-reasoning hits from 308.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 12% (38,791 of 43,774 speakers). This Batya Ungar-Sargon is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Batya Ungar-Sargon
Speaker details
Total words: 308.333
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 9.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos308.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 26.0% 26.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 19.2% 19.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst