Speaker summary
⁠40%2 analyzed articles/videos4,123.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anat Shenker-Osorio results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 507.366 hits. Analysis detected 4,656.319 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,123.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (44,318 of 44,411 speakers). This Anat Shenker-Osorio is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group.
Anat Shenker-Osorio
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠1%Anat Shenker-Osorio (selected)2%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 4,123.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos