Speaker summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amil Niazi results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 148.314 hits . Analysis detected 1,284.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 754 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (42,063 of 44,316 speakers). This Amil Niazi is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Amil Niazi
Speaker details
Total words: 754
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 6.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos754 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst