Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video109.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Brock results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 68.5% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 196 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (20,518 of 45,134 speakers). This Aaron Brock is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Aaron Brock
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
55%Aaron Brock (selected)34%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 109.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos109.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 68.5%68.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 68.5%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos