Publication summary
63% 8 analyzed articles/videos 10,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Real Change results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 2,441 hits . Analysis detected 24,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,971 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (334 of 584 publications). This Real Change is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 37,971
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles38K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst