Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 2,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martin results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , In-Group Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 941 hits . Analysis detected 3,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,449 of 9,512 authors). This Martin is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group. Martin
Author details
Total words: 8,144
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst