Publication summary
64% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KCCI results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,254 hits . Analysis detected 21,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,298 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (174 of 556 publications). This KCCI is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 31,298
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles31.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst