Publication summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos3,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KCCI results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,254 hits. Analysis detected 21,871 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,298 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (174 of 556 publications). This KCCI is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
KCCI
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
69%KCCI (selected)3%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 31,298
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

69% percentile
025507510068.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles31.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.5%3.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Publication 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos