Keyword summary
74% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington County results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,683 hits . Analysis detected 22,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,613 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (49,631 of 59,661 keywords). This Washington County is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Washington County
Keyword details
Total words: 29,613
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles29.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst