Keyword summary
88% 67 analyzed articles/videos 47,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 19,056 hits . Analysis detected 162,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 207,107 analyzed words across 66 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (49,471 of 59,653 keywords). This Virginia is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group. Virginia
Keyword details
Total words: 207,107
Article count: 66
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score66 analyzed articles207.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst