Keyword summary
41%4 analyzed articles/videos2,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Viral Videos results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 5,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,996 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 21% (47,745 of 59,751 keywords). This Viral Videos is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Viral Videos
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
21%Viral Videos (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,996
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate